Two days ago, a piece of news suddenly spread--
Yang Ying's social media account has been unsealed.
Some of Zhang Jiani's accounts have also been unsealed.
Does this mean that the Crazy Horse Show is about to end?
Looking back over the past five months, from Lisa official Xuan Crazy Horse Show to Yang Ying and Zhang Jiani's account was banned.
A series of events continue to set off a discussion about women's "sexual freedom" on the Internet.
Uncle Yu had also talked to everyone about related topics before.
And a new movie recently launched has opened up new ideas for me.
The scale of the movie is bigger than the Crazy Horse Show.
Including a variety of curiosity play, but also staged 18 banned versions of "Burning Winter".
And it's not just about scale.
The film won the Golden Leopard Award, the highest award at the Locarno International Film Festival, one of the four major European film festivals.
The actress also won the crown of the film queen.
In fact, under the fierce picture, the topic discussed in the film is very realistic and enlightening.
Rule 34 Regra 34
The heroine of this film is a law student who is about to become a lawyer.
With a capable hairstyle and a professional suit, she looks like an elite.
She will actively help women who suffer from domestic violence.
Take great pains to do justice for the victims in court.
She is also a feminist who loses the opportunity to speak for women.
On weekdays, when having dinner with friends, once you hear the poisonous speeches of men.
She will also go back unceremoniously.
Properly sober and independent professional female image.
However, as soon as the camera changes, people set up "collapse"--
When night fell, she reappeared in a very different identity.
Look at the computer camera and take off your clothes one by one until you get naked.
She's doing a live broadcast on an adult website.
Countless netizens gathered around, constantly sending out provocative words.
She was rewarded one after another, instructing her to make all kinds of shameful actions.
The hostess seems to be familiar with all this.
She smiled all the time and did it one by one.
Do not see the slightest sense of shame, but also make people feel happy in it.
At the end of the live broadcast, she put on her clothes one by one.
Also has been pretending to be charming looking at the camera, a large twist of the body.
Finally, reluctantly said to the camera, "Thank you for your kindness." "
Seeing this, many people may find it difficult to understand.
Adult live broadcasting is a blatant sexual exploitation industry.
As a legal practitioner, the female master is also a feminist.
How can you participate in it and even enjoy it?
Her answer is simple--
"I like it. "
When she did the live broadcast, she felt "excited" from the bottom of her heart.
She insisted on doing it purely to satisfy her desires.
She first came into contact with the industry when she defended a sex worker.
At that time, I did hold the idea of a work-study program.
But unexpectedly, it opened the door to a new world.
She found herself happy to show her body to the camera.
The watching and teasing of countless people also made her feel excited and excited.
At one point, she wanted to drop out of law school and pursue her dream in the adult industry.
Her friend reminded her, "that's a small pension."
She joked that she could be a "two-faced person".
"A public defender during the day and a pornstar at night. "
She's not just so bold on the Internet.
Her avant-garde hobby has always been magnanimous and has not been hidden from her friends.
In reality, her love life can be called 18 banned editions of "burning winter".
She maintains an open triangle with two partners, a man and a woman.
The three of them often get bored together, drinking, dating and having parties.
Strip naked every minute and put on a restricted picture.
All kinds of explosion settings are superimposed together, and this area is really shocking.
So, what is it trying to say?
In fact, it is still a question of "sexual freedom or sexual exploitation".
This topic has been at odds with each other since the Lisa Crazy Horse Show.
The film portrays a female master with strong contrast, which seems to show the unruly posture of the heroine in pursuit of sexual freedom.
But in fact, the answer was in the negative.
Although at first, the hostess decided that there was nothing wrong with this way of life.
She thinks she is mature enough to balance the two identities and has never felt exploited.
However, with the expansion of desire, she tried more and more novel sexual behaviors.
When the boundary of freedom is pushed infinitely outward, the problem is exposed.
She realized that she could not afford the price of freedom.
For a while, she had a sudden interest in choking games and was eager to try them.
In order to seek satisfaction, she took a bold move.
She invited her boyfriend to practice with herself.
And broadcast it live online.
However, this choice did not bring the expected excitement and excitement at all.
Because they did not discuss the exit mechanism in advance, their lives were almost in danger in the process of implementation.
Extreme fear occupied her whole mind.
As soon as the live broadcast was over, she cried that she would never do it again.
What is the problem?
Her friend revealed the secret.
She thinks of herself as a live platform to release herself.
The spectators, manipulators and those in power behind it are all men.
She was stared at from beginning to end, but she refused to admit it.
Her so-called pursuit of sexual freedom is only imitating the behavior in existing cognition.
She thought her enthusiasm and initiative rewrote the oppressed narrative.
But in reality, she is merely imitating the sexual gestures of men in certain adult films.
In the film, there is an intimate scene between her and her girlfriend.
She insulted each other rudely and grabbed each other by the neck.
She wanted to stir up desire with it.
Unexpectedly, his girlfriend was very angry and said bluntly that she felt uncomfortable and scared.
In fact, she wanted to try to suffocate, not on her own initiative at all.
It was the people in the live broadcast room who made such a request.
Her first reaction was to feel dangerous and refused.
But the mechanism of the studio does not allow her to refuse, nor does the rewarding audience allow her to refuse.
She had no choice, so she hinted to herself that she was interested.
In the end, she felt inadequate in both identities.
As a lawyer, she is not only unable to help victims of domestic violence win lawsuits.
She could not help but sympathize with the abusers and understand their psychology of abusing others.
Everyone present was shocked by the proposal to reduce the guilt of the domestic violence man in court.
As an anchor, she is also more and more passively involved.
She was obviously afraid of the live broadcast and had to take a deep breath and build herself before turning on the computer.
But I can't help but throw myself into it again and again.
The film has a terrifying ending.
After she was frustrated in the workplace, she chose to post the news on the live broadcast platform:
"20000 gold coins, come to my house and do whatever you want. "
The first eldest brother of her list immediately responded positively and asked for a detailed home address.
Once, in order to defend herself, the female owner invoked such a message in court_
Brazil has the fifth highest murder rate among women in the world, with one woman killed every two hours. "
But at that time, she revealed her personal address to a strange man full of sex.
And is about to have a bottomless sexual relationship with each other for money.
When there was a knock at the door of the hostess's house.
She was aware of the danger, but could not resist the thrill.
She stood behind the door for a long time, imagining all the possibilities that might happen.
The camera features her face, which flashes with curiosity, desire, unease and panic.
The film stops at the moment when the door is opened.
Speaking of, it is not uncommon for film and television works that focus on female sex workers and reveal their uncontrollable plight.
However, most of them show the fate of women at the bottom being exploited.
This film actually shows us that elite women will also inadvertently fall into the trap of a patriarchal society.
It was just that the process was more secretive and less noticeable.
And it is often shown as the bullying and admiring behavior of trying to sever seats with women at the bottom, just like the female masters.
In fact, there are many examples in reality.
For example, Miyuki Suzuki is known as Chihiko Ueno's best-selling book, beginning with the limit.
She was born into a well-educated family, but chose to become an adult film actress.
She thought she could carry it clearly, but she was pointed out bluntly by Chihiko Ueno:
"it seems that neutrality is not brave enough. Not admitting that you are weak in the game is tantamount to ceding the weapons of gender combat to the men on the other side. "
There is also Dr. Wang Yilin of the University of Hong Kong who attracted attention some time ago because of the "people" report.
In order to write her graduation thesis, she joined the live show to do fieldwork.
I thought that as a researcher, I could observe this industry soberly.
But the alienation of the system is beyond her imagination.
She found herself looking forward to the audience's gaze and unconsciously making sexual gestures that she realized only when her friends reminded her.
She called it "desperate labor".
"it's not the so-called oppression and alienation, someone forces you to do all this behind your back, but when you get to this environment, you will do these things more and more voluntarily. "
Back to the movie.
The title of the film "Rule 34" is actually a network trunk.
It means that anything can be sexualized.
It's kind of like the popular saying "sexual brain" before.
Pay too much attention to sex and emotion, and put sexual relationship above all relationships.
In fact, this is the discourse of gender order constructed by the patriarchal society in order to consolidate the dominant position of male power.
When it is coated with "love" and "freedom".
It also means that women can be sexualized and materialized at any time, and completely lose power in repeated sexual exploitation.
However, it is still a long way for women to regain the power to define desire.
